AUSTIN, Texas — Embattled Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is again making headlines due to legal issues.
On Wednesday, May 24, a Texas House committee is holding a hearing regarding an investigation into Paxton's $3.3 million settlement with whistleblower former employees who accused him of abuse of office.
But this is far from the first legal issue Paxton has faced while in office. Throughout his time as attorney general, he has faced many controversies.
Below is an interactive timeline detailing some of the attorney general's legal woes over the past few years:
A further breakdown of Paxton's legal issues can be found below:
April 2014 - July 28, 2015
The Texas Tribune breaks the news in April 2014 that then-state senator and attorney general candidate Ken Paxton was paid for soliciting clients for an investment firm but wasn't registered with a state board.
Paxton eventually pays a $1,000 civil fine.
A left-leaning group asks the Travis County District Attorney to look into the case, but the DA decides to wait until after the November election.
Paxton is elected as the state's attorney general. The Travis County DA passes the case along to Dallas and Collin counties, where the alleged crimes took place.
With the statute of limitations almost up, the Collin County District Attorney steps off the case because of his relationship with Paxton. The Texas Rangers and independent special prosecutors take over the investigation and present it to a grand jury.
On July 28, 2015, Paxton is indicted.
RELATED: Five years after indictment, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton still hasn't had his day in court
Paxton's criminal trial on securities fraud charges is set to begin in May.
In May, a state appeals court temporarily halts Paxton's criminal case while it considers his request to oust his judge.
In June, Paxton receives a new judge in his securities fraud case.
Oct. 3, 2020
A group of top aides for Paxton asks federal law enforcement to investigate him for possible crimes that include bribery and abuse of office.
RELATED: 7 high-ranking whistleblowers allege criminal violations against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
Nov. 5, 2020
Former high-ranking executives at Paxton's office claim they faced retaliation and intimidation after making allegations against him.
Nov. 13, 2020
The Associated Press reports that Paxton had an extramarital affair with a woman whom he later recommended for a job with the wealthy donor at the center of criminal allegations against him.
Nov. 13, 2020
Four senior aides to Paxton file a lawsuit claiming he retaliated against them after they alerted federal investigators about possible improper and illegal dealings with an Austin investor.
Dec. 10, 2020
KVUE Senior Reporter Tony Plohetski confirms that FBI agents have issued at least one federal subpoena for records from the Texas Attorney General's Office in an ongoing investigation into the allegations against Paxton.
Jan. 11, 2021
A group of activist leaders gathers outside Paxton's office to call for his removal, claiming he is "criminally and morally unfit for office."
March 25, 2021
Paxton's office refuses to release all messages he sent or received while in Washington for the pro-Donald Trump rally on Jan. 6.
RELATED: Ken Paxton refuses to release messages sent while at pro-Trump rally on day of US Capitol riot, report says
June 2, 2021
Paxton asks an appeals court to toss the whistleblower case brought by former top aides.
June 9, 2021
The Texas Bar Association begins investigating whether Paxton’s failed efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election based on bogus claims of fraud amounted to professional misconduct.
Aug. 24, 2021
An internal investigation undertaken by Paxton's office clears him of breaking any laws after allegations by several high-ranking aides.
Oct. 21, 2021
The Texas Third Circuit Court of Appeals issues an opinion stating that the former employees of Paxton's office who accused him of abuse of power and other legal violations are protected by the Texas Whistleblower Act. The court also affirms a previous district court decision to deny Paxton's motion to dismiss.
Jan. 7, 2022
Paxton asks the Texas Supreme Court to dismiss the whistleblower lawsuit by four former employees who said they were fired after accusing Paxton of abuse of power and other legal violations.
Feb. 21, 2022
The whistleblowers who sued Paxton after he fired them for accusing him of abuse of office and bribery speak out for the first time.
March 3, 2022
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals adds to its docket a lower-court ruling that moved Paxton's securities fraud criminal case back to Collin County.
May 6, 2022
Paxton announces that the state bar is suing him for professional misconduct related to his lawsuit challenging the 2020 presidential election.
RELATED: Ken Paxton says he’s being sued by the state bar for misconduct over his lawsuit challenging the 2020 election
May 25, 2022
A disciplinary committee for the State Bar of Texas files a professional misconduct lawsuit against Paxton for his attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential elections in four battleground states won by President Joe Biden.
RELATED: Texas state bar files professional misconduct lawsuit against Ken Paxton for attempt to overturn 2020 presidential elections
Sept. 20, 2022
A district judge throws out the State Bar of Texas’ professional misconduct case against Brent Webster, Paxton’s top aide, for his work on a case that challenged the results of the 2020 presidential election.
RELATED: Judge dismisses attempt to discipline Texas AG Ken Paxton's top aide for trying to overturn the 2020 election
Sept. 26, 2022
Paxton flees his home to avoid being served a subpoena for a federal court hearing in a lawsuit from nonprofits that want to help Texans pay for abortions out of state, according to an affidavit filed in federal court.
Later the same day, Paxton filed a motion to seal the affidavit, arguing that the server “loitered at the Attorney General’s home for over an hour, repeatedly shouted at him, and accosted” Paxton and his wife. The motion was granted by a U.S. district judge.
RELATED: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton fled his home to avoid being served with subpoena, court record says
Nov. 8, 2022
Paxton defeats Democrat Rochelle Garza in race for attorney general, securing a third term.
Feb. 9, 2023
Paxton agrees to apologize and settle the whistleblower lawsuit for $3.3 million. In the settlement, which is to be paid for with public dollars, it says that "Attorney General Ken Paxton accepts that plaintiffs acted in am after that they thought was right and apologizes for referring to them as 'rough employees.'" He also agrees to remove a statement from the AG's website that called the whistleblowers "rogue employees."
The Texas Legislature is required to approve the settlement agreement.
Feb. 16, 2023
Justice Department officials in Washington, D.C., take over the corruption investigation into Paxton, removing the case from the hands of federal prosecutors in Texas.
Feb. 21, 2023
Paxton asks the House Appropriations subcommittee for $3.3 million to fund the whistleblower settlement.
Assistant Attorney General Chris Hilton tells the subcommittee that the Attorney General's Office has already spent nearly $600,000 in taxpayer money on the case and argues that paying the settlement agreement is in the state's financial interest.
Hilton argues that the cost to taxpayers could exceed the agreed-upon settlement amount if the lawsuit were to continue. Hilton also clarifies that Paxton is not personally responsible for paying the settlement because the lawsuit is against the Attorney General's Office and not Paxton himself.
March 6, 2023
Nate Paul, the Austin real estate investor central to the allegations of illegal conduct by Paxton, is found in contempt of court, fined more than $180,000 and ordered to serve jail time.
RELATED: Nate Paul, real estate investor in Paxton corruption allegations, found in contempt of court, ordered to jail
March 8, 2023
The whistleblowers file a motion asking the Texas Supreme Court to agree to allow their lawsuit to proceed because, they say, Paxton's office will not agree that the Texas Legislature would have to approve the settlement during the 2023 legislative session.
The court granted a joint motion on Feb. 16 agreeing to abate the lawsuit while the parties proceeded with settlement negotiations, but the March 8 motion states that Paxton's office said in oral communications that "it has maneuvered" the whistleblowers into a "GOTCHA position."
The motion also states that in written communications, Paxton's office said that it was researching what happens if the Legislature decided not to fund the settlement during the 2023 session.
RELATED: Proposed $3.3 million settlement in whistleblower lawsuit against Texas AG Ken Paxton in jeopardy
May 23, 2023
The Texas House's Committee on General Investigating sends Paxton's office a letter stating that there is a House investigation into Paxton asking for public money to settle with the whistleblowers and instructing Paxton's office to preserve records.
Later the same day, Paxton sends a tweet from his personal account calling for House Speaker Dade Phelan to resign at the end of the current legislative session. Paxton says Phelan was recently "in a state of apparent debilitating intoxication" while presiding over the House, apparently referring to videos shared across social media days earlier, showing Phelan slurring words while presiding over the chamber.
Paxton's office also sends a letter to the chairman of the Committee on General Investigating, Andrew Murr, calling for an investigation into Phelan "for violation of House rules, state law, and for conduct unbecoming his position."
In response to Paxton's tweet, Phelan's office calls the action "little more than a last-ditch effort to save face" over the investigation into the whistleblower allegations.
RELATED: Texas House speaker Dade Phelan's office responds after AG Ken Paxton called for his resignation
May 24, 2023
The House Committee on General Investigating begins its hearing regarding the investigation into Paxton's $3.3 million whistleblower settlement. Four invited witnesses are scheduled to provide testimony.
The hearing has no legal bearing.
Meanwhile, on a morning talk show, Paxton is asked about the House investigation into him.
"I don't know. This is unprecedented for what they're doing. I have no idea why they've chosen to do this," Paxton says. "This is a level that is shocking to me, especially from a Republican House. This is what they're [using their] time to do instead of some of the important things like school choice."