By Ben Brumfield
This might sound like a legal conundrum:
A Florida jury has pronounced George Zimmerman not guilty of killing Trayvon Martin.
But a court could still hold him accountable for the death.
Martin's family so far has only commented that it wants the public to respect the Florida court's verdict.
Two options, however, are available: A civil suit, or a civil rights suit.
Though they sound familiar, they are very different:
A civil suit allows one party to seek monetary damages against another for causing physical or emotional harm, regardless of the outcome of a criminal trial.
A civil rights suit involves criminal charges for violating someone's civil rights, which are protected under federal law.
Take what happened to O.J. Simpson 17 years ago.
After a criminal court acquitted him of charges in the 1994 killing of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson, a civil court held him responsible in 1997 for her "wrongful death."
It ordered him to pay her family more than $33 million in damages. They then stripped Simpson of every asset they could get their hands on.
Wrongful death is easier to prove than murder or manslaughter.
A defendant can be held liable, even if he or she didn't intend to cause the victim's death, according to Florida law.
Simple negligence is enough, if it results in death.
Did Zimmerman act negligently, when he exited his vehicle to pursue Martin on foot while carrying a gun -- although a 9-1-1 operator told him not to?
Would the 17-year-old still be alive, if he had not done so?
Those are questions a lawyer for Martin's family would be sure to ask in a wrongful death suit.
Martin's family has so given no indication so far of wanting to pursue an additional suit.
But someone else has.
Civil rights suit
The NAACP is pushing the U.S. Department of Justice to file a civil rights suit.
They accuse Zimmerman of racial profiling that lead to Martin's death.
"The most fundamental of civil rights - the right to life - was violated the night George Zimmerman stalked and then took the life of Trayvon Martin," the group said.
The Justice Department did not respond directly to the NAACP demand. It has a separate federal investigation going on.
It's a legal path that worked in the case of Rodney King, whom Los Angeles police officers clubbed down in 1991 after a car chase.
The beating of the African-American man was caught on video and later aired on news broadcasts.
When a criminal court failed to convict the white officers of police brutality, riots ensued in Los Angeles over alleged racial discrimination.
The Justice Department filed a civil rights suit against the officers, alleging racial profiling, and two were convicted in 1993 as a result.
A court sentenced them to 30 months in federal prison.